THEY are hard to resist -- children in shabby clothes, dirty and sad-faced, asking for a dollar -- in US currency.
Indeed, what’s one
dollar when we already spent hundreds on hotels and air tickets for a holiday
which is meant to not only be fun-filled but to also broaden our horizon as we
experience life in a foreign land -- away from the daily office grind?
So even as our gut feelings
told us not to, we still handed over a dollar for a postcard, a bracelet, a
bunch of bananas or a package of peanuts, if not merely in response to the pleading
from some poor street munchkin -- give me
one dollar, I need to buy milk for my hungry brother.
Then you passed by
some musicians sitting on a platform with their prosthetic legs in plain sight –
probably victims of bombs and land mines. At such moments, you’d find it easier
to part with gifts.
It’s only a dollar.
Even with our depreciating ringgit, it’s still only RM3.30 -- a mere sacrifice of
kampua mee kosing and kopi-o kosong for breakfast.
While travelling
further to a floating village at Lake Tonle Sap during a recent visit to Cambodia, the nine of us in our
group were “forced” to buy a 50kg sack of rice for an orphanage, each of us
chipping in US$5.
I did a mental
calculation – it would mean a kilo of rice for RM3.60 which is considered very
expensive and I know I don’t go for that price range for the staple.
The Russian couple in
our group started collecting from each one of us. It was difficult and painful for
me and my other three journalist friends – we knew it was a scam. And it was because
of fear that a refusal could spoil our holidays in a bad way that made us open
our wallets.
There are lots of
overwhelming sights and spots in Cambodia
– Angkor Wat, Lake Tonle Sap or Phnom
Penh.
While it’s only
human that our immediate response was to want to fix the problems we saw during
our walkabouts, our impulsive-ness was often futile in the long run.
Yes, it all
appeared so natural and harmless but who knows what resistance may bring? It’s
sad and seems so callous and cruel.
The unfortunate
truth is that the situation is bad. Why do begging children exist in the first
place? Why shouldn’t we give money to begging children? What is really going
on?
Often we assume
children willingly beg to support their destitute families. But the real story
may be quite different – children are frequently trafficked from the villages and
forced to beg along ur-ban streets or in tourist areas.
Iveta Cherneva wrote
in her book -- Trafficking for Begging:
Old Game, New Game – that traffickers will choose children with handicaps as
a handicapped child earns three times more than a healthy one.
However, the
scenario can be much worse. According to reports, not all child beggars are
trafficked – sometimes, they are exploited by their own parents.
“The bottomline is
that giving money to street kids is not pro-ductive in solving the issues with
them, with their families, or with them being on streets.
“There are more
complicated issues going on behind their cute faces and shabby clothes,” Sam
Flint, director of Anjali House, an education centre for former street children
in Cambodia, told the New York Times.
I talked to a
tourist guide, Chat, 21, while heading to Lake Tonle Sap and he told me giving
“a dollar” to the street children ensured a thriving labour market for these
youngsters whom, he pointed out, shouldn’t be working in the first place at their
young age.
He said many of
them were not from Siem Reap but brought in from other provinces to work in the
streets.
“By supporting these
children, we are exposing them to predators, traffickers, drug dealers and
child sex tourists.”
As Chat continued,
a boat carrying two children (each with a small python coiled round their necks)
and an adult came near our vessel.
As I clicked away happily
with my camera, one of the little boys drew the snake nearer me, saying give me a dollar.
The creepy thing
scared me but Chat said: “Don’t give.
These kids are supposed to be in school now. Giving them hand-outs jeopardises
their future -- every dollar a tourist gives deprives the parents of an
incentive to make sure their kids go to school and get a proper education.”
According to Chat,
there are over 24,000 child street sellers working throughout Cambodia.
Twenty-four thousand
children! That’s a lot. But if I don’t buy from them just to show that I’m not
supporting child labour – or even that I’m depriving them of schooling -- then
they will go hungry. If I buy, maybe they will have some food to eat -- maybe,
they can also go to school?
My one dollar may
create a positive interaction between me and the child who receives it, but
where will the money go at the end of the day? Will the positive interaction go
further or stop with the child?
UN volunteers,
children charities and aid groups introduced a campaign in Cambodia in 2011
called Think Twice with the inform-ed
motto Let parents earn and children
learn.
And consider this
too -- the Child Safe Network suggested supporting vocational
training projects and buying products made by these parents so they can earn an
income and keep their families together and volunteer their skills with organisations
which are building the capacity of local staff to ensure long-term
sustainability of the community.
I don’t have the
right answer – to give or not to give.
Maybe, I shall go by instinct to help lighten the burdensome tray of peanuts a sweet
innocent girl is carrying on her head, or brighten up the face of the girl
selling bamboo flutes?
No comments:
Post a Comment